Robert Desprez Communications

  • My Services
  • My Blog
  • About Me
  • Contact Me
You are here: Home / Career Development / WHY WEB 2.0 IS RELEVANT FOR TECHNICAL WRITERS

WHY WEB 2.0 IS RELEVANT FOR TECHNICAL WRITERS

January 8, 2011 by RDesprez 3 Comments

Tweet

In Decem­ber, I start­ed a dis­cus­sion in a few LinkedIn groups titled, “Most tech­ni­cal writ­ers are not embrac­ing Web 2.0.”

It stirred up a lot of feed­back. Most peo­ple seemed to agree, not­ing that they haven’t had time to research Web 2.0 when wrestling with chal­leng­ing projects, such as set­ting up doc­u­men­ta­tion in XML and DITA.

Some mem­bers, how­ev­er, respond­ed by say­ing that Web 2.0 is just a “mar­ket­ing con­cept,” imply­ing that it has lit­tle val­ue for tech­ni­cal writers.

I strong­ly disagree.

Here’s why I think Web 2.0 is rel­e­vant for us:

  1. Social media is not just a fad and it’s not going away. Quite the opposite—more and peo­ple appear to be using it. Here’s one star­tling fact about Face­book: it has more than 500 mil­lion users and peo­ple spend “700 bil­lion min­utes per month” on the site. In case you’re count­ing, Face­book users out­num­ber the com­bined pop­u­la­tion of Cana­da and the U.S. (Check out Facebook’s sta­tis­tics page.)
  2. We’re no longer the gate­keep­ers of con­tent. In decades past, tech­ni­cal com­mu­ni­ca­tors wrote the tech­ni­cal doc­u­men­ta­tion for a prod­uct and it was the offi­cial con­tent for a com­pa­ny. These days, we no longer have a monop­oly on sup­port con­tent. Online dis­cus­sions may abound about your prod­uct, and most of it is indexed by Google and is read­i­ly acces­si­ble. It’s not uncom­mon to find that this “unof­fi­cial” sup­port con­tent (i.e. forums) is often dis­played before our offi­cial con­tent in search results. This pos­es a chal­lenge to writers—how do we ensure that our con­tent is eas­i­ly found by all users?
  3. Peo­ple are already shar­ing their thoughts on your prod­ucts. With Web 2.0, online com­mu­ni­ties and dis­cus­sions are some­thing we all take for grant­ed. Online com­mu­ni­ties are rat­ing books on Ama­zon. Vaca­tion­ers are rat­ing hotels on Tri­pAd­vi­sor. And they may be rat­ing your prod­uct and your doc­u­men­ta­tion. In short, dis­cern­ing online users have nev­er had so much con­trol over their pur­chas­ing deci­sions. For writ­ers, we should mon­i­tor if users are writ­ing feed­back on our prod­ucts using tech­nolo­gies like Google Alerts.
  4. Writ­ers are already using Web 2.0. Anne Gentle’s book Con­ver­sa­tion and Com­mu­ni­ty doc­u­ments a few exam­ples in which com­pa­nies are using tech­nol­o­gy like wikis for tech­ni­cal doc­u­men­ta­tion. The Adobe Labs wiki, for exam­ple, tar­gets devel­op­ers using Adobe tech­nol­o­gy and is appar­ent­ly one of the top wikis for daily-use.

I believe that Web 2.0 is one of the trends that will for­ev­er change how we do our jobs. Ignor­ing it or sug­gest­ing it’s just for mar­ket­ing folks is seri­ous­ly under­es­ti­mat­ing its importance.

Filed Under: Career Development, Robert Desprez | Vancouver technical writer | Blog, Social Media, Technology, Web 2.0 Tagged With: social media, technical writing, Web 2.0

Comments

  1. Mellissa Ruryk says

    March 21, 2012 at 6:55 pm

    Hear, hear!

    Reply
  2. Robert Desprez says

    March 21, 2012 at 6:55 pm

    In case you’re not sure what Web 2.0 is, here’s my def­i­n­i­tion of it in two paragraphs.

    In decades past, as a soci­ety, we could all watch the finale of a pop­u­lar TV show. The next day, we might dis­cuss the episode with fam­i­ly mem­bers or col­leagues around the water cool­er. The main thing to remem­ber, though, is view­ers had no say on the cre­ation of the show. For most of us, we were pas­sive view­ers of enter­tain­ment and media.

    Web 2.0 changes that. We’re now active con­trib­u­tors of con­tent. Any­one with an Inter­net con­nec­tion and a com­put­er can cre­ate a YouTube video, add some con­tent to a Wikipedia page, write a blog, and so on. As a soci­ety, we can remain pas­sive or choose to be active contributors.

    Reply
  3. Anonymous says

    March 21, 2012 at 6:56 pm

    I agree with your point about tech­ni­cal com­mu­ni­ca­tors embrac­ing and tak­ing advan­tage of the oppor­tu­ni­ties that Web 2.0 presents.

    One thing Web 2.0 has done is pro­vide a means for audi­ences to be more engaged as opposed to just being “con­sumers of infor­ma­tion”. Audi­ences now have a way to pro­vide feed­back on the infor­ma­tion that was pro­vid­ed. And that’s a very impor­tant tool for tech­ni­cal com­mu­ni­ca­tors to gauge how effec­tive their work is.

    All the best to you Robert.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About Robert Desprez

I have worked as a Vancouver technical writer for more than 20 years, working at some of British Columbia's largest high-tech firms. I have served in leadership positions for the Society for Technical Communication and have worked as a writing instructor at Vancouver's Simon Fraser University.

Robert Desprez Follow 1,208 239

Vancouver Technical Writer. Former Instructor at Simon Fraser University. Dog Lover. Coffee Drinker. Tennis and Piano Player.

robert_desprez
robert_desprez avatar; Robert Desprez @robert_desprez ·
26 Jul 2081426469667180993

Are we living in a post-literate society?

Image for twitter card

Opinion: A viral essay declares the end of reading is here. But there’s no end to its pleasures

To all Canadians who still buy books: Tell each other about the ones you love

www.theglobeandmail.com

Reply on Twitter 2081426469667180993 Retweet on Twitter 2081426469667180993 0 Like on Twitter 2081426469667180993 0 Twitter 2081426469667180993
robert_desprez avatar; Robert Desprez @robert_desprez ·
26 Jul 2081426169262674164

Image for twitter card

Being effective at work boils down to knowledge, methods, people and technology

Think of your effectiveness architecture as a two-storey house, says Melissa Swift. On the ground floor are knowledg...

www.theglobeandmail.com

Reply on Twitter 2081426169262674164 Retweet on Twitter 2081426169262674164 0 Like on Twitter 2081426169262674164 0 Twitter 2081426169262674164
Retweet on Twitter Robert Desprez Retweeted
robert_desprez avatar; Robert Desprez @robert_desprez ·
21 Jul 2079411504575877320

Being effective at work boils down to knowledge, methods, people and technology

Reply on Twitter 2079411504575877320 Retweet on Twitter 2079411504575877320 1 Like on Twitter 2079411504575877320 0 Twitter 2079411504575877320
robert_desprez avatar; Robert Desprez @robert_desprez ·
21 Jul 2079411504575877320

Being effective at work boils down to knowledge, methods, people and technology

Image for twitter card

Being effective at work boils down to knowledge, methods, people and technology

Think of your effectiveness architecture as a two-storey house, says Melissa Swift. On the ground floor are knowledg...

www.theglobeandmail.com

Reply on Twitter 2079411504575877320 Retweet on Twitter 2079411504575877320 1 Like on Twitter 2079411504575877320 0 Twitter 2079411504575877320
Load More

Recent Blog Posts

  • Using ChatGPT to read smarter
  • ChatGPT: The AI-powered proofreader
  • Four ways Confluence could be better
  • First impressions of MadCap’s purchase of IXIASOFT

About Me

Robert Desprez I have worked as a Vancouver technical writer for more than 20 years, working at Kodak, Boeing, Teck Resources, and FortisBC. In addition, I have worked as a writing instructor at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver.

Contact Me

Robert Desprez Com­mu­ni­ca­tions Inc.
North Van­cou­ver, British Columbia
Canada
Phone: 604–836-4290

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2026  · Robert Desprez Communications Inc.