When I recently started using Adobe’s latest version of FrameMaker, I felt déjà vu.
Back in the 2000, when I used FrameMaker 6.0, I wrote content in the software program and then converted it to WebHelp using Quadralay Corporation’s WebWorks, which was integrated into FrameMaker at the time. I tagged my content in FrameMaker using paragraph styles and WebWorks dutifully converted those paragraph styles into HTML code. At the time I worked for a company that wanted me to create a help project that took advantage of single sourcing. Somehow, I foolishly accepted the task of figuring how to create WebHelp out of FrameMaker.
The project had its share of challenges. The main one was that Webworks’ Java-based version of the help was not reliably appearing on users’ screens, ostensibly due to issues with the Java Runtime Environment. After considerable hair pulling, I discovered that WebWorks could output a JavaScript version of the help. Disaster averted!
In 2005, Adobe acquired Macromedia and with it RoboHelp, its help authoring tool. A few years later, Abobe offered its Technical Communications Suite, which provided tighter integration between FrameMaker and RoboHelp. For the first time, you could write content in FrameMaker and then have content converted to help by RoboHelp. Sort of like the FrameMaker and WebWorks integration.
But not exactly. As RoboHelp has been around since 1991, much of its user interface looks like a movie from the 1990s. FrameMaker is no spring chicken either. Together, the user is faced with two respected but old and bloated software programs that are forced to communicate for the first time. The communication worked but it wasn’t ideal. For example, when I linked the help files in RoboHelp to the original FrameMaker files, the updating process was slow and sometimes inconsistent. If I made an edit to a FrameMaker chapter, RoboHelp didn’t always detect the change. And the updating process wasn’t exactly sprightly.
Fast forward to Adobe’s latest version of FrameMaker. Version 12 enables technical writers to create online help right from FrameMaker. By not forcing users to deal with RoboHelp in the help creation process, I found creating WebHelp to be much faster than earlier versions when users needed to toggle between FrameMaker and RoboHelp.
FrameMaker 12 can create HTML5 help for mobile devices, WebHelp, EPUB files, Kindle files, and Microsoft HTML Help.
I have used RoboHelp for years and creating online help directly from FrameMaker does require some paradigm shifts (for example, how table of contents are created). But overall, FrameMaker 12 makes it faster and simpler to create online help. A welcome change.
J'Ro says
So do you think this is the end of RoboHelp? And would you recommend Frame?
RDesprez says
Hi Jerome,
Yes, I would recommend FrameMaker as an authoring tool. I’ve used it for more than 15 years and it has many advantages over Microsoft Word.
I’m not sure that this feature represents the demise of RoboHelp, which offers more control than FrameMaker over the table of contents, adding Captivate videos, and so on.
If I was to speculate why this online help feature was included in FrameMaker, I’d say it is due to online help tools like MadCap Flare. I’ve used Flare and it permits authors to easily create PDFs and modern looking online help. MadCap is aggressively marketing Flare and I’m sure it is challenging Adobe’s once dominant market position. I have no stats to back this up though.
Thank you for your comment.
Robert
Paul Noga says
I cannot see FrameMaker providing context-sensitive help functionality (as RoboHelp does). In addition, I can’t see FM offering the “hot-mapping-zones” functionalty (as RoboHelp does).
Dieter Gust says
FM supports context sensitive help:
It creates the .h file that lists the contents of the TopicAlias Markers (MapId/TopicId) together with auto generated Map numbers beginning with 1. But the explanations in the online help is totally insufficient.
FM knows hot spot areas for creating image maps.
So what is missing except a real help information?
RDesprez says
Hi Dieter,
Thank you for commenting.
Yes, I agree. The FrameMaker help is disappointing. I just wrote a blog entry about it: https://robertdesprez.com/2015/03/22/framemaker-12-documentation-disappoints/
Robert